Skip to footer

top

Supreme Court Rules Reach Stackers Not 'Motor Vehicles'

Updated 2 min read

Archived — last updated

The Supreme Court has ruled that reach stackers are not 'motor vehicles' under the Motor Vehicles Act. The ruling is seen as a key development in the transportation sector.

Latest updates

Supreme Court Rules Reach Stackers Not 'Motor Vehicles'

The Supreme Court has ruled that reach stackers are not 'motor vehicles' under the Motor Vehicles Act. The ruling is seen as a key development in the transportation sector. The court's decision was based on the definition of a 'motor vehicle' in the Motor Vehicles Act, which excludes certain types of vehicles. Reach stackers are used in the transportation of goods and are considered to be a type of heavy machinery. The ruling is seen as a key development in the transportation sector, and is expected to have implications for the industry.

Supreme Court Rules Manufacturers, Maintenance Agencies, and Building Owners Liable for Lift Accidents

The Supreme Court has ruled that manufacturers, maintenance agencies, and building owners can all be held jointly liable for lift accidents. The court has classified elevators as 'common carriers', introducing stricter legal responsibilities. The ruling is expected to affect every apartment society, office building, and public space in the country. The court has laid down new rules that could have a significant impact on the way lift accidents are handled in the country. The ruling is a significant development in the country's legal landscape.

Supreme Court Holds OTIS Liable For RAW Officer's Death Due To Lift Malfunction

The Supreme Court has held elevator maker OTIS liable for the death of a RAW officer due to a lift malfunction. The court's decision was made in a case where the officer died after falling from a malfunctioning lift in 2019. The court found that OTIS was negligent in the design and maintenance of the lift, which led to the officer's death. The court's verdict is a significant one, as it sets a precedent for liability in cases of lift malfunctions. The case has been pending in the court for several years, and the verdict is expected to have a significant impact on the elevator industry. The court's decision was made on July 29, 2026.

Sources