Skip to footer

politics

Non-Filing of Charge Sheet Copies Does Not Confer Default Bail: Supreme Court

Updated 2 min read

Published by Agyata NewsroomEditorial policyCorrections

Archived — last updated

The Supreme Court has ruled that non-filing of charge sheet copies does not confer default bail. The court has clarified that the non-filing of charge sheet copies is not a ground for default bail, and that the accused must be present in…

Latest updates

Non-Filing of Charge Sheet Copies Does Not Confer Default Bail: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that non-filing of charge sheet copies does not confer default bail. The court has clarified that the non-filing of charge sheet copies is not a ground for default bail, and that the accused must be present in court to claim bail. The ruling has significant implications for the criminal justice system, where the non-filing of charge sheet copies has often been used as a ground for default bail. The court has held that the non-filing of charge sheet copies is a procedural lapse, and that it does not affect the merits of the case. The ruling is a significant development in the criminal justice system, where the court has sought to clarify the law on default bail. The court has also emphasized the importance of the accused being present in court to claim bail.

LawBeat

Supreme Court Rules Consumers Should Not Pay for Unused Services

The Supreme Court has ruled that consumers cannot be made to pay for a service they no longer receive, saying tariff determination is not merely a mathematical exercise but a regulatory balancing act aimed at protecting consumer interests. The court set aside a February 2025 order of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, APTEL, in connection with the Rithala Combined Cycle Power Plant case. The ruling is expected to have a significant impact on the electricity sector in India.

News On AIR

Supreme Court Rules on Use of Four-Letter Expletives

The Supreme Court has ruled that the use of four-letter expletives is abusive but not obscene. The court has emphasized the distinction between vulgarity and legal obscenity. The ruling comes after a petition was filed against the use of such language in public spaces. The court has held that while the use of such language may be distasteful, it does not qualify as obscene under the law.

The Hindu

Sources

AI-assisted summary of the reporting above. Quotes are kept to one sentence. Copyright concern? See our DMCA takedown page.